Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Manavi et al. Sensitivity of microscopy for the rapid... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

The efficiency of detecting gonorrhea by microscopy varies depending on the serovar and auxotype of the infecting strain.

Sensitivity of microscopy for the rapid diagnosis of gonorrhoea in men and women and the role of gonorrhoea serovars.
Manavi K, Young H, Clutterbuck D
International Journal of STD & AIDS 2003;14:390-394

 

Summary:

Question
What is the sensitivity of the microscopic diagnosis of genital gonorrhea by N. gonorrhoeae serovar in males and females attending a genitourinary medicine clinic?

Design
This study describes a retrospective examination of the Gram stain result and the N. gonorrhoeae auxotype and serovar among cases of positive culture for N. gonorrhoeae at a genitourinary medicine clinic.

Participants
Five hundred ninety-six cases of positive culture for N. gonorrhoeae occurring at the Genitourinary Medicine clinic of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh from 1995 to 1999, including the auxotype and serovar of each isolate, were evaluated.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Gram staining and microscopy of urethral samples from men and of urethral and cervical samples from women were performed on patients who were symptomatic, who were contacts of partners with gonorrhea, or who had signs of infection on examination. Microscopy was performed by doctors on samples from men, and by a Medical Laboratory Scientific Officer on those from women. Samples from the urethra of all patients, from the cervix of female patients, from the rectum of women and men who have sex with men (MSM), and from the pharynx of those with microscopically observed Gram-negative intracellular diplococci at another site, of contacts of partners with gonorrhea, and of all MSM and female sex workers were plated onto modified New York City agar for culture of N. gonorrhoeae.

Main Outcome Measures
The prevalence of gonorrhea and the sensitivity of microscopy for detecting infection were compared by patient group and by N. gonorrhoeae auxotype and serovar.

Main Results
Two hundred ninety-seven (49%), 107 (18%), and 192 (32%) of 596 N. gonorrhoeae culture positive cases were MSM, women, and heterosexual men, respectively. The sensitivities of gonorrhea diagnosis by microscopic examination of samples from anogenital sites for these three patient groups are shown in the table. Serovars1B31 and 1B02 were frequently undetected by microscopy in samples from females and MSM, respectively, while serovar 1A02 was more likely to be missed by microscopy in samples from heterosexual men. Negative microscopy was more probable with auxotype NR in samples from MSM and females (P=0.0002) and with auxotype AHU among heterosexual males (P=0.0005).

Authors' Conclusions
The sensitivity of microscopy in the rapid diagnosis of gonorrhea was highest for urethral infection among MSM. Infections with certain N. gonorrhoeae serovars were less likely to be detected by microscopy.

Source of funding: None given.

For correspondence: Kaveh Manavi, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lauristan Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK. E-mail address: tirbad@yahoo.com

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001