Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Koumans et al. Comparison of methods for detection... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

PreservCyt could be used as an alternative medium for the collection and transport of specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction.

Comparison of methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests and a liquid Pap smear medium.
Koumans EH, Black CM, Markowitz LE, Unger ER, Pierce A, Sawyer MK, Papp JR.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003;41:1507-1511.

 

Summary:

Question
What is the stability of chlamydial and gonococcal DNA in PreservCyt, a methanol-based liquid cytology medium? How well do the results of a ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay performed on cervical samples placed in PreservCyt agree with those of samples placed in LCx medium? What is the performance of the LCR assay on cervical samples in PreservCyt compared to NAATs and culture performed on conventional samples for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections?

Design
This study describes 1) an evaluation of the stability of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae DNA in PreservCyt, 2) the agreement between the results of cervical samples tested by LCR when placed in PreservCyt compared to LCx medium, and 3) a blinded comparison of the performance of the LCR assay on cervical samples in PreservCyt with those of culture, PCR, and TMA on samples from multiple sites for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in adolescent women.

Participants
A subset of 225 nonpregnant, HIV-negative, sexually active adolescent women, aged 12 to 19 years old (mean = 16.6 years) attending an adolescent clinic at a public pediatric hospital in Atlanta, GA, who were part of a larger longitudinal STD study, and who required a pelvic exam were tested. Women who had received antibiotics in the previous month were excluded.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
For the assessment of DNA stability in PreservCyt, three different concentrations of C. trachomatis (1000, 100, and 10 inclusion-forming units/ml) and 3 different concentrations of N. gonorrhoeae (1000, 100, and 10 CFU/ml) were added to three aliquots each of PreservCyt (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA) that were incubated at room temperature, 4oC, and 37oC and tested after 24 h, 48 h, and 7 d, producing a total of 27 samples for each organism. Dacron swabs saturated in liquid from each concentration were immersed in PreservCyt and tested under the same conditions.

Clinical samples collected from each woman included separate endocervical swabs for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis detection by culture, PCR (COBAS Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NJ), LCR (LCx, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL), and TMA (Amp CT, Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, CA) (C. trachomatis only), and a cervical broom placed in PreservCyt, a vaginal swab, and urine for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis detection by LCR, PCR, and both, respectively. The swab for N. gonorrhoeae culture was collected first, the broom sample second, and the others in random order.

N. gonorrhoeae was cultured on Martin-Lewis agar plates, an oxidase test and Gram staining were performed on suspected colonies after 24 and 48 h, and the NHI card or the rapid NH strip (bio-Merieux Vitek, Hazelwood, MO) was used to confirm detection. C. trachomatis was cultured on BGMK cells grown on coverslips in 1-dram shell vials with 200 μl of inoculum and detected following 48 h of incubation by staining with a fluorescein-labeled anti-MOMP monoclonal antibody (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ). Swab and urine specimens for the NAATs were collected and tested according to the directions provided by the manufacturers' package inserts. One ml of each PreservCyt specimen was centrifuged, the pellet suspended in 1 ml of LCx urine resuspension buffer, heated at 95 to 100oC for 15 min, and tested according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Main Outcome Measures
Agreement and the kappa statistic were calculated to ascertain agreement between the two cervical specimen collection methods (PreservCyt and LCx) using the same assay (LCR). The sensitivity and specificity of the LCR assay performed on cervical samples in PreservCyt were determined using a patient reference standard based on the combined PCR results of cervical, vaginal, and urine specimens, and a multitest reference standard based on the combined results of culture, TMA, and PCR at any site.

Main Results
In the stability experiments, C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were detected by LCR in all 27 spiked samples and swabs. The agreement between LCR on cervical samples in LCx medium and in PreservCyt was 0.97 and 0.96, and the kappa was 0.92 and 0.96 for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively. Of five C. trachomatis LCx positive, PreservCyt negative subjects, all were positive by at least one other test. Of three C. trachomatis PreservCyt positive, LCx negative subjects, all were negative by all other tests.

Seventy (27%) of 255 subjects had chlamydial infections and 27 (11%) had gonococcal infections by cervical PCR. The performance of the LCR on cervical samples in PreservCyt compared to a PCR patient standard (cervical, vaginal, and urine samples) and to a multitest standard (culture, TMA, and PCR at all sites) for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae is shown in the table.

Authors' Conclusions
PreservCyt medium is an acceptable specimen type for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by LCR. A single cervical specimen can be used for cervical cytology and STD screening using a nucleic acid amplification assay.

Source of funding: Cytyc Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and Gen-Probe Inc.

For correspondence: Emilia H. Koumans, DSTD/NCHSTP, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS E-02, Atlanta, GA 30329. E-mail address: exk0@cdc.gov.

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001