Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Obata-Yasuoka et al. A multiplex polymerase chain... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

A multiplex PCR assay is less sensitive than Gram stain examination for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic method for bacterial vaginosis.
Obata-Yasuoka M, Ba-Thein W, Hamada H, Hayashi H.
Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:759-64

 

Summary:

Question
How well does a PCR assay that detects multiple anaerobic bacteria compare to Gram- stained slides scored according to the Nugent method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV)?

Design
This study evaluates a multiplex PCR assay that detects multiple anaerobes implicated in bacterial vaginosis and compares its performance for the diagnosis of BV to that of Gram-stained slides scored according to the Nugent method.

Participants
One thousand women presenting to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department in the Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan were tested for BV. Women younger than 15 and older than 76 years, and those who had antimicrobial therapy within 2 weeks of sampling were excluded. Swab samples from 172 women were randomly selected for testing by PCR from among 853 with Gram stain-interpretable slides. One hundred thirty-eight women (mean age = 29.9 years) were pregnant and 34 (mean age = 39.8 years) were not.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
One vaginal swab collected from each patient was used to make a slide and inoculate a culture, then placed into 2 mL of saline. Bacteria in the saline sample were pelleted by centrifugation, suspended in water, boiled, and centrifuged, and the supernatant was added to a multiplex PCR reaction. The PCR reaction mix contained three primer pairs that amplified the 16S rDNA gene from Mobiluncus species (M. mulieris and M. curtisii), the nanH gene from Bacteroides fragilis, and the internal spacer region of rDNA from Gardnerella vaginalis. PCR amplicons were detected on agarose gels. To determine the sensitivity of the assay, dilutions of each target organism with a known number of colony forming units in 2 mL of saline were tested. The specificity of the assay was confirmed by sequencing the amplicons produced by amplification of the target organisms, and by testing 13 other bacterial and one yeast clinical isolate found as normal vaginal flora. Vaginal swab samples were considered BV positive when one or more species of targeted bacteria were detected by multiplex PCR. Vaginal slides were Gram stained and evaluated using the Nugent scoring system. Samples with a score greater than 6 were considered BV positive.

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PCR assay for the diagnosis of BV as determined by a Gram stain Nugent score were calculated.

Main Results
The sensitivity of the multiplex PCR assay was 6 X 103 to 2 X 104 colony-forming units per 2 mL for the four target organisms. No amplified products were detected in samples containing other bacteria or yeast. The results of the PCR assay and the Gram stain Nugent score for 172 vaginal samples are shown in the table. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the multiplex PCR assay compared to Gram stain examination for the diagnosis of BV were 78.4%, 95.6%, 82.9%, and 94.2%, respectively.

Results of BV diagnosis by multiplex PCR and Gram stain evaluation

Multiplex PCR

Gram stain using Nugent score

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

29

6

35

Negative

8

129

137

Total

37

135

172

Authors' Conclusions
Although Gram staining remains an indispensable tool for the diagnosis of BV, the multiplex PCR method, in combination with clinical diagnosis, can be used as an alternative screening test, especially for women who are undergoing other screening.

Source of funding: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan

For correspondence: Mana Obata-Yasuoka, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan. E-mail address: md995455@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.

 

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001