Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Wendel et al. Trichomonas vaginalis polymerase... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

The sensitivity of a PCR assay exceeded that of wet prep and culture for the detection of T. vaginalis in women attending an STD clinic.

Trichomonas vaginalis polymerase chain reaction compared with standard diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for detection and treatment of vaginal trichomoniasis.
Wendel KA, Erbelding EJ, Gaydos CA, Rompalo, AM.
Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:576-580.

 
Summary:

Question
What is the reliability of a PCR assay compared to wet preparation and culture for the detection of T. vaginalis, and how does the number of patients with T. vaginalis infection who receive metronidazole treatment under current clinical algorithms compare with the projected number who would receive treatment if PCR were used for diagnosis?

Design
This study describes a cross-sectional, retrospective comparison of the results of a T. vaginalis PCR assay with those of wet preparation, Papanicolaou smear, and culture for detection of T. vaginalis infection in high-risk women. The number of women who received treatment using CDC guidelines was compared to the number who would have received treatment if PCR had been used for diagnosis.

Participants
Three hundred thirty-seven women attending a Baltimore City Health Department STD clinic who had not received antibiotic therapy within the 2 weeks prior to their visit were tested. Ninety-eight percent were African-American, and the mean age was 28 years. Seventy percent were symptomatic, and 21% had recent exposure to a partner with an STD.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Swab specimens from the posterior fornix of the vagina were mixed with 2-3 drops of normal saline on a slide and examined microscopically for evidence of motile T. vaginalis. A second swab specimen was used to inoculate an InPouch TV test (Biomed Diagnostics), which was incubated at 37oC and examined microscopically at 1, 2, and 5 days. Cervical samples were obtained with an Ayre spatula, fixed on a slide, and Papanicolaou stained. Vaginal swabs stored frozen in PCR buffer (Amplicor, Roche Diagnostics) were thawed and 100 µL was processed with Amplicor specimen buffers. The PCR primer set BTUB 9/2 was used to target 112-bp conserved regions of the 3 b-tubulin genes of T. vaginalis. Amplicons were electrophoresed on agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and compared with commercial size markers. Discordant results between BTUB 9/2 PCR and cultures were adjudicated with primer sets TVK 3/7 and AP65 A/B. True positive samples were defined as those positive for T. vaginalis by wet prep, culture, or by PCR that was confirmed with a second primer set.

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity and specificity of each of the diagnostics methods for true T. vaginalis infection as defined above were determined.

Main Results
T. vaginalis infection was detected in 97 (29%) of 337 women. The performance characteristics of the T. vaginalis diagnostic assays are shown in the table. Metronidazole treatment was provided to 67 (69%) of 97 positive women based on current clinical algorithms. The use of the PCR assay for diagnosis of trichomoniasis would have allowed treatment of 81 (84%) of 97 women with T. vaginalis infection.

Performance characteristics of T. vaginalis diagnostic assays performed on 337 women.
Assay % Sensitivity
(95% CI)
% Specificity
(95% CI)
Wet preparation 52 (41-62) 100
Papanicolaou smear 24 (15-34) 99 (97-99.9)
Culture 78 (69-86) 100
PCR 84 (75-90) 94 (90-97)

Authors' Conclusions
The sensitivity of PCR for the detection of T. vaginalis exceeded that of wet preparation and culture, and its specificity was high. Use of T. vaginalis PCR would improve the identification and treatment of T. vaginalis infections.

Source of funding: Not given.

For correspondence: Karen Wendel, 921 NE 13th St. (111C), Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail address: karen-wendel@ouhsc.edu.

expert review

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001