Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Leach et al Performance of two commercial... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

Two commercial ELISA tests had very different performance characteristics when used to test pediatric sera for HSV antibodies.

Performance of two commercial glycoprotein G-based enzyme immunoassays for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2 in children and young adolescents.
Leach CT, Ashley RL, Baillargeon J, Jenson HB.
Clin Diag Lab Immunol. 2002;9:1124-1125

 

Summary:

Question
What is the accuracy of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of HSV-1 and 2 antibodies in blood samples from children and adolescents?

Design
The results of two commercial ELISA assays that detect and distinguish HSV-1 from HSV-2 antibodies on the basis of type-specific antigens of glycoprotein G-1 (gG-1) and G-2 (gG-2), respectively, were compared to those obtained by western blotting performed on sera collected from children and adolescents.

Participants
Healthy children from southern Texas (n = 61; mean age, 7.4 years; range, 1 to 13 years) and pediatric patients referred to the University of Washington for HSV type-specific serology (n = 128; mean age, 5.7 years; range, 1 to 13 years) were tested.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Sixty-one sera were tested with an ELISA assay from Gull Laboratories (Salt Lake City, UT) that was sold by Meridian Diagnostics (Cincinnati, OH), and 128 sera were tested with the HerpeSelect HSV-1 and HSV-2 ELISA (Focus Technologies, Cypress, CA). Both assays use type-specific antigens of gG-1 and gG-2 to distinguish HSV-1 from HSV-2 antibodies. The Gull/Meridian assay uses immunoaffinity-purified antigens, while the HerpeSelect uses antigens based on baculovirus recombinant gG-1 and gG-2. All sera were tested by standard HSV-1 and HSV-2 western blot assays.

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each ELISA assay compared to the western blot assay for the detection of HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies were determined.

Main Results
The performance of the two ELISAs compared to western blot for detection of HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies in pediatric patients in shown in the table. The seroprevalence of HSV-1 by western blot in the samples from Texas was 49%, no samples were HSV-2 positive. Of the sera from the University of Washington, 36% were seropositive for HSV-1 and 6% for HSV-2 by western blot. The performance of the HerpeSelect assay was based on 123 sera because 5 had equivocal results (2 by HerpeSelect HSV-2 and 3 by western blot). The Gull/Meridian had very low specificity and PPVs, especially for HSV-2. The HerpeSelect had high specificity for both HSV-1 and HSV-2, however, the sensitivity for HSV-1 was low.

Concordance among 57 laboratories testing panel 2 samples
Virus ELISA Sensitivity (%)  Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
HSV-1 Gull/Meridian 100 74.2 78.9 100
HerpeSelect 80 97.4 95 89
HSV-2 Gull/Meridian Indeterminate 47.5 0 100
HerpeSelect 87.5 100 100 99

Authors' Conclusions
The two ELISAs had very different performance characteristics with pediatric sera. The accuracy of HSV serologic testing for children appears questionable with current ELISAs, and a serologic diagnosis of HSV infection should be made with caution. A negative test should be followed by testing in 6 to 8 weeks to detect seroconversion, and positive results for HSV-2 antibodies should be confirmed by a second type-specific test.

Source of funding: Public Health Service grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

For correspondence: Charles T. Leach, Department of Pediatrics, Mail Stop 7811, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. E-mail address: leachc@uthscsa.edu.

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001