Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Barenfanger J et al. Timing of ... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

The timing of inoculation did not affect the results of the InPouch TV method for detection of T. vaginalis.

Timing of inoculation of the pouch makes no difference in increased detection of Trichomonas vaginalis by the InPouch method.
Barenfanger J, Drake C, Hanson C.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40:1387-1389.
 
Summary:

Question
Is the timing of inoculation of the pouch for the InPouch TV test critical for optimal growth and detection of T. vaginalis organisms?

Design
This study assessed the effect of timing the inoculation of the bottom portion of the InPouch TV test for T. vaginalis and its effect, if any, on the results of the test. The first method was to delay inoculation of the bottom pouch until the initial microscopic examination of the top pouch was performed. A second method was to inoculate the bottom pouch immediately after specimen collection. Both methods were compared to a conventional wet mount preparation of the specimen on a glass slide.

Participants
This study included 498 women with signs and/or symptoms of vaginitis, vaginal discharge, dysuria, dyspareuria, and/or "strawberry" cervix who attended the hospital emergency department and various clinics in the region of Springfield, IL, including an urgent care center, a family practice clinic, and a women's health center.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Vaginal secretions were suspended in saline and processed by one of three methods: 1) inoculation of the top portion of the InPouch TV test (BioMed Diagnostics, San Jose, CA) and inoculation of the bottom pouch only after the microscopic examination of the top was complete, regardless of the transit time, 2) inoculation of the top portion as for method 1) with inoculation of the bottom pouch immediately. For this method, the microscopic exam was performed on the bottom pouch when the specimen arrived in the lab, and 3) a traditional wet preparation in which 2 to 3 drops of each patient's secretions were placed on a glass slide and examined microscopically. If the results of the wet prep for methods 1) and 2) were negative, the pouches were incubated and examined on days 2, 3, and 5. A positive result from either the wet prep or the InPouch was considered a true positive. The transit time of the tests varied from 4 to 570 minutes, with 68% of the tests arriving within 1 hour, and a mean time of 76 minutes.

Main Outcome Measures
The number of specimens by each inoculation method that were positive for T. vaginalis by microscopic examination before or after incubation were determined.

Main Results
Thirty-one of 498 specimens (6.2%) were positive for T. vaginalis upon initial microscopic examination of the upper pouch, regardless of the transit time. Inoculation methods 1) and 2) produced identical results: an additional nineteen samples were positive by either method after incubation, for a total of fifty (10.0%) positives. These results can be compared with 36 samples (7.2%) that were positive for T. vaginalis by microscopy using the conventional wet prep method. Eight of the positive InPouch samples had transit times greater than 3 hours.

Authors' Conclusions
Within the limitations of this experiment, an immediate vs. delayed inoculation of the lower pouch did not affect the overall performance of the InPouch for growth and detection of T. vaginalis.

Source of funding: BioMed Diagnostics.

For correspondence: Joan Barenfanger, Microbiology, Memorial Medical Center, Pathology Department, 701 N. First St., Springfield, IL 62781. E-mail address: barenfanger.joan@mhsil.com.

expert review

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001