PROBLEM-BASED TRAINING EXERCISES FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY |
|
Prepared by Linda Rosenstock, MD, MPH; revised by Steven Markowitz, MD
February 1990; revised January 1997
Learning objectives:
PART 1 - INTRODUCTION
Salmonella infections pose a particularly serious risk if they become blood-borne in the host (septicaemia), carrying a high fatality rate. In your role as a health officer, you have been asked to assist in an investigation of salmonella septicaemia in Kenyan children. You will be working with a team of physicians who have been caring for some of the children with this disease at the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH). The term salmonellosis refers to infection caused by bacteria of the genus Salmonella, of which there are 3 primary species: 1) Salmonella typhi - the cause of enteric "typhoid fever", 2) Salmonella. cholerasuis and 3) Salmonella enteridis - which includes Salmonella. typhimurium -a subtype of increasing prevalence and antibiotic resistance in Kenya. Salmonella septicaemia results when pathogenic species enter and multiply in the bloodstream. This may or may not be accompanied by the typical findings of gastroenteritis (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea), but is of particular concern because infections may spread and mortality and morbidity (e.g. need for amputation) are high. Infections result from ingestion of food or water contaminated from human or animal sources. Animal sources include poultry, rodents, cattle, pigs, snakes, etc.. Salmonellae are easily killed during cooking. The main goal of the study is to learn more about salmonella septicaemia in Kenya, particularly to understand which children are at greatest risk for getting sick, so that environmental interventions to reduce the risk can be undertaken. |
Question 1: Re-state the main problem in the form of hypotheses that should be investigated.
Question 2: What kind of epidemiological study would you suggest? What are some of the potential problems that might be associated with this type of study?
PART 2 - DEFINITION OF A CASE
| You decide to do a case-control study. You define a case as follows: Study Case Definition:
Cases will be identified and enrolled prospectively into the study over the 5-month period. You plan to obtain information from the parent or guardian about environmental exposures and past medical history of each case. |
Question 3: What are the advantages and limitations of this case definition?
Question 4: List the kinds of information you would like to obtain in your interviews with the parent or guardian.
PART 3 - CHOICE OF CONTROLS
| You have a long discussion with your colleagues about the choice of a control group. A number of control groups are considered, including: a) community controls - children of same age in the community who did not get sick, and b) hospital controls. You finally decide to use hospital controls - a set of children with the same age and sex distribution as the cases and who were admitted consecutively to the Paediatric Emergency Ward, KNH. 108 children are selected as controls. |
Question 5: Discuss some of the considerations in choosing the control group. List the advantages and disadvantages of community and hospital controls. Would you include children admitted with the diagnosis of diarrhea but who do not have salmonellosis as controls?
PART 4 - CASE PROFILE: RATES OF OCCURENCE
| From a total of 4095
paediatric admissions during the survey time period (five months), 60 cases (children with
salmonella septicaemia by blood culture) were identified.
Among the 60 cases, 46 (77%) were infected with Salmonella typhimurium, 7 (12%) with other types of non-typhoidal salmonella, and 7 (12%) with Salmonella tyhpi ("typhoid fever"). Males and females are equally affected. The age distribution of the cases by type of Salmonella infection is shown in Figure1.
|
Question 6: What can you say about the pattern of the age distribution for those getting non-typhoidal septicaemia? How does this compare tothose who get typhoidal septicaemia?
PART 5 - DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
You decide to look more closely at those cases who have community-acquired infections, in other words, who had the infection prior to coming to the hospital. The cases who meet this definition are 70% (32/46) for S. typhimurium and 100% (7/7) for S. typhi infection. You then analyse the place of residence for the children with community-acquired infections. 47% (15/32) of those with community-acquired S. typhimurium infection came from Nyanza Province, 16% (5/32) from the eastern margins of Central Province, and 13% (4/32) from Eastern Province. Only 13% (4/32) were from Nairobi (3 from a shanty area adjacent to a sewage plant). 86% (6/7) of S. typhi infections were acquired in Nairobi shanty towns. The map of the distribution of community-acquired infections is shown in Figure 2. |
|
Question 7: What do you think about the geographical distribution of cases of the two types of salmonella infection? Are they different? What hypotheses do you have about the distribution?
Question 8: Do you think that coming from Nyanza Province is a risk factor for developing community-acquired salmonella septicaemia? What additional information would you need to determine the magnitude of possible risk associated with geography?
PART 6 - COMPARING CASES AND CONTROLS: PLACE OF RESIDENCE
You compare the home locations of those with community-acquired S. typhimurium septicaemia.
The results are shown in Table 1. (Note these databare not derived directly from
the published case report):
|
|||||||||||||
Question 9: Calculate and interpret the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval associated with living in Nyanza province and being hospitalised with S. typhimurium septicaemia.
Question 10: What can you now say about the factor, residence in Nyanza Province, in terms of risk for becoming a case? Is it a causal factor? What hypotheses do you have about these findings?
PART 7 - COMPARING CASES AND CONTROLS: HYGIENE AND SANITATION
Additional results are available to compare community-acquired cases and controls in
terms of other environmental factors. The main findings are shown in Table 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question 11: Set up the 2 x 2 tables and calculate the odds ratio for each factor. Then, to assess statistical significance, (i.e., the probability that the observed difference is due to chance) calculate the chi-square value and the p value.
What do you think about the role of these risk factors in causing salmonella infection? Are they important? How do they fit in with your main hypothesis? What additional hypotheses could explain these findings?
Question 12: What other kinds of information would you like to have available to compare cases and controls?
PART 8 - PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSES
The most severe disease occurred in the 53 children with non-typhoidal septicaemia, with an 18% fatality rate (no patients with typhoid died); 19% (10/53) had coexisting malaria parasitemia (compared to none with typhoid). Antibiotic resistance was high, especially for S. typhimurium, and had increased significantly between 1980 and 1986. Four of the cases had sickle cell disease; 42% of children with non-typhoidal bacteria had severe protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). You confirm that malarial infections (81% of cases come from malaria endemic areas), malnutrition and sickle cell disease are all associated with increased host susceptibility to infections like salmonellosis. But the underlying problem of contamination of food and water sources must be addressed. |
Question 13: What recommendations would you make to reduce the risk of Salmonella infections?
Question 14: What role can you as a health officer play in helping to assist in implementing these recommendations? Which are most important? Which are most feasible?
Based in part on a report by Nesbitt, A. & Mirza, N.B. Salmonella Septicaemias in Kenyan children. J. of Tropical Paediatrics, 1989, 35: 35-39.