Distinguished Participants,
Colleagues,
We now have the opportunity for a much more effective response to the
HIV epidemic. The world is listening.
We know how to prevent the spread of HIV and provide care for those
infected. The tools are complex and imperfect. But we know that when
used correctly, these tools can help slow the epidemic, relieve
suffering and enable millions of people to have additional years of
quality life.
With opportunity comes responsibility and challenge. There are no
more excuses. The millions who are infected and the hundreds of millions
who are at risk will not forgive us if the world does not take advantage
of the opportunities for action that exist today.
No one constituency can act alone to change the face of this
epidemic, whether we are from national governments or international
agencies, associations of people living with HIV, NGOs, the private
sector, academic institutions, community organisations or public
interest groups. Wherever there is inequity, conflict or lack of mutual
respect, the virus feeds on our divisiveness. More than ever, we need to
unite and exert our leadership in responding to the destruction to
society that has been wrought by HIV.
So today, I talk about this leadership. Leadership is needed to act
early, effectively and boldly. It is needed to set tough priorities. To
seek - and then provide - the resources required to reverse the spread
of HIV; to make sure that these resources are well used.
What is, then, the essence of this leadership: I sum it up in four
words:
- Clarity.
- Certainty.
- Confidence.
- Creativity.
Let me begin with Clarity.
Clarity about what is happening now and what is at stake.
50 million people –1% of the world’s population – have become
infected with HIV. Young girls are most affected. In a study of eleven
African countries, the rate of infection in teenage girls was over five
times higher than in boys of the same age. Each day more than 15,000
people become infected. 1,600 of them are children, infected during or
shortly after birth.
Infection rates in the Caribbean are also high. There is an epidemic
in Asia with more than 6 million people infected, and the potential for
millions more.
We can be clear about the consequences. HIV affects more
people than it infects. It makes families poor as they try to
meet the costs of health care and funerals: they become poorer as they
cope with the loss of income following the death of a breadwinner. HIV
disease leaves behind orphans with an uncertain future. It is
undermining many recent development gains: life expectancy and child
survival rates have plummeted in several countries in Africa.
We can be clear about the cause. Without the virus, there would be no
AIDS epidemic.
The spread of HIV through our societies is fuelled, mostly, by people
experiencing high levels of sexually transmitted infection and having
unprotected sex with multiple partners. This is more likely in
circumstances where men purchase sexual activity through a commercial
transaction or where women and girls are forced, by men, to have sex
against their will.
We must never forget that almost half of those actually infected with
HIV are women in monogamous relationships, dis-empowered, fearful, and
often stigmatised. If they are infected, and pregnant, there is a
significant possibility of the virus being transmitted to the newborn
child.
In some parts of the world, and increasingly in developing countries,
the recreational use of drugs, mostly by injection, is a significant
cause of HIV spread. And, shockingly, HIV continues to be transmitted
through un-screened blood and blood products, even though effective
technologies exist to prevent this.
HIV infection thrives on poverty and marginalisation. The epidemic is
sustained by social disruption, by historical inequities of wealth,
gender and race, and by migrant labour practices.
We can be clear about what is possible. The major impact of the
epidemic is yet to come. But we have found interventions that work. They
can reduce HIV incidence by up to 80%.
We can be clear about the opportunities. During 1996, in
Vancouver, we learned that a combination of medicines and services,
properly applied, prolongs and improves the lives of those living with
HIV. Later that year, in Abidjan, the voices of the millions of people
suffering with HIV in Africa rose loudly, requesting access to care.
Yet, we can also be clear about the reality. Commitments on prevention
for all, and care for those who need it, have yet to be fulfilled.
Now we are all looking for ways to increase access to care at a price
which governments and their people can afford. The World Health
Assembly, called for WHO and other UNAIDS partners to pursue dialogue
with the pharmaceutical industry and with member states and associations
of people living with HIV and AIDS, and to co-operate with governments
on possible options under international agreements, as well as the TRIPS
agreements, to improve access to HIV-related drugs. As you know, WHO
generally recommends the promotion of essential drugs, and the use of
quality generic drugs whenever possible.
We can also be clear that there will be no simple solution to the
problems posed by HIV. Even when an effective HIV vaccine eventually
emerges, experience have shown that it will take years to make it
available to all who need it. Primary prevention effects will still have
to be sustained. The expectation of a vaccine in the future is no excuse
for inaction now.
Colleagues
As good leaders we know when it is right to be certain about key
issues. Our actions are based on clear values, and are informed by
scientific analysis of available information, and past experience. They
are not just based on belief, anecdote or ideology. The evidence may
cause us to change positions: we know how to decide the right time to
make changes, and implement them.
We know what works – and what does not work – in reducing HIV
transmission.
We are certain about the need to prioritise.
Efforts to prevent HIV infection must prioritise the groups most
vulnerable to infection:
- Girls and boys, who are at their highest risk of infection just as
they begin to explore life;
- The infant who may have been infected before she entered this world;
- and other people who are at high risk.
In the process of creating expanded multisectoral responses to the
epidemic, the focus on the most vulnerable groups has slipped in many
countries.
We know through both pilot projects and national-scale programmes
that reducing the transmission of HIV among groups with high-risk
behaviour is an effective way of limiting the spread of infection.
Ensuring regular condom use by a person who has 1000 different sex
partners each year is much more efficient at reducing HIV transmission
than ensuring condom use by 1000 people who have one new partner a year.
This is true in countries with very high spread of infection, as well as
in those with a low infection rate.
Yet, we still have not seen any systematic, nation-wide action to
reduce high-risk behaviours. This will have to change. It will often
mean accepting unhappy realities about the societies we live in.
We are certain that HIV testing is critical. In a population
where HIV infection rates are high, it is crucial for individuals to
know their own status – and that of their partners.
Voluntary counselling and testing is the entry point to both
prevention and care. It is the key to responding to the major obstacle
to prevention efforts - that the majority of people living with HIV/AIDS
do not know they are infected.
We are certain that condoms work, particularly among those who change
partners often. Experience suggests that it is easier to make sexual
contacts safer rather than stop the contacts occurring at all.
Amazingly, although condoms have been recognized as the main
safeguard against transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted
infections for more than 15 years, efforts to promote their availability
and use are far from universal.
Men’s reluctance to use them should not be used by governments and
NGOs as an excuse for not promoting them. It is simple. Every man and
woman should have access to - and know the importance of – condoms.
We are certain that effective treatment for sexually transmitted
infections reduces HIV incidence. Yet, as leaders, we are not doing
enough. The global burden of curable sexually transmitted infections is
enormous. STI are one of the leading causes of loss of healthy years of
life even in the absence of HIV infection.
STI detection and treatment must be an essential component of HIV
prevention programmes.
We are certain of the importance of working with adolescents - in
ways that have meaning to them. Around 11.2 million or one third of
the world’s HIV infected population are boys and girls between the
ages of 10 to 24. Every day, 7,000 of them acquire HIV. That means 2.6
million new infections among them every year, 2 million are in Africa.
The evidence has never been clearer – programmes that target and
involve young people work. In Brazil, Senegal, Thailand, Uganda and
parts of Tanzania, HIV infection rates among young women have been cut
by over 40% as a result of effective prevention programs.
Moving on - good leaders know the importance of being confident.
Good leaders themselves have gone through the cycle of denial, apathy
and desperation. But they have quickly emerged, putting in place
effective actions to counter the epidemic.
Being confident means taking bold decisions based on incomplete
information. We will never know enough. We can never be 100% sure about
success. But once we stand on solid scientific and moral ground, we must
act and act confidently.
There are no dress rehearsals. Every day of hesitation results in
thousands more infections.
We must have the confidence to act on mother to child transmission.
Considerable progress has been achieved. We now have better evidence
of the potential for antiretrovirals, administered in pregnancy, to
reduce HIV infection rates in infants.
The challenge now is to make safe antiretrovirals available to all
who need them. Preliminary results indicate that Nevirapine
administration reduces Mother to Child transmission, but more work will
be necessary to confirm safety and efficacy. There shall be no delay in
this effort.
New studies confirm what we long have suspected. Breast feeding by
mothers living with HIV puts the infant at risk of infection – often
negating drug therapies that saved the infant from infection during
delivery.
This raises extremely difficult issues on the recommendations for
breast-feeding. How do we ensure that the lack of breast-feeding does
not jeopardise further the growth and development of the child? How do
we make sure that mothers that do not live with HIV or are unaware of
the HIV status continue breast-feeding?
To find the right answers, we must put aside old conventions, old
solutions. We must think creatively and we must act together: health
authorities, the private sector and the NGOs.
The best leaders reflect their clarity, certainty and confidence in
extremely creative ways.
They no longer talk about "what we do" and instead focus on
"what people get". They have stopped using terms like
"could and should" and instead use "will and can".
When solutions to new problems are proposed, and make sense, they say
"lets give it a try." Above all, they believe in bringing
people together, in concerted action.
This means that leaders engage their constituencies in setting
targets and prioritising. They mobilise the human and financial
resources, medicines and commodities, needed to scale up action. They
explore the potential for mass marketing of preventive action,
franchising of services, means to subsidise poor peoples’ access to
services, and independent mechanisms for monitoring progress. They don’t
give up.
One more characteristic. It embraces all the others: Courage.
Courage to act. Courage to confront our societies in their full
complexity. Courage to talk openly about sexuality, about violence
against girls and women, about drug use and about poverty. Courage to
focus on those who are most vulnerable to HIV. Courage to break the
silence.
Despite strong statements and heartfelt promises, people with HIV
still experience discrimination and stigmatisation. We need the courage
to end such attitudes once and for all.
Only six months ago, the potential for better access to care seemed
non-existent. Then in May, as you now, five leading pharmaceutical
companies agreed with UNAIDS and its UN partners to begin a dialogue on
how to drastically improve access to care and reduction in prices of
drugs. That dialogue also needs to comprise companies in the generic
sector.
It is good news that the companies are now working with several
countries to improve access to care for people with HIV. The
Ministers of Health in these countries have shown great courage in
starting to work in this way given the difficulties they might have –
short term, at least, in meeting their people’s expectations.
The UNAIDS secretariat and cosponsors have set up a structure to
facilitate discussions for wider access to care can be discussed between
the companies and interested countries. We are making real progress,
more than we could have expected only a few months ago.
But care for those infected with HIV, those living with HIV disease
and those dying from it involves much more than distribution and
administration of drugs. I would like to pay a heartfelt tribute to
the courage and commitment of millions of care providers in
families, communities and hospitals all over the world.
Courage is needed to prevent HIV spread. The focus is on changing
some of the behaviours that contribute to HIV infection. Violence
against women is an important contributor to HIV’s spread. It is a
significant public health and social problem. Real courage is needed to
start addressing gender-based violence within the context of preventing
HIV infection. Along with incest and child abuse, rape and violence
against women remains a taboo.
In 1980, 20 per cent of the adults infected with HIV were women. Ten
years later, that figure has more than doubled. At the end of the
century, 46 per cent of HIV positive adults were women. In some parts of
Africa infection rates of adolescent girls now run 3 - 6 times higher
than boys of the same age, a glaring result of gender inequality and the
exploitation of girls.
We will not achieve progress against HIV until women gain control
of their sexuality. Women’s courage is unbeatable. I am
confident that – over time – we will succeed. The first step is to
speak out against all forms of violence against women: domestic
violence, rape and sexual abuse. But it goes further. Women must know
and feel that society supports them when they say no to unwanted or
unprotected sex.
Women must get the means to protect themselves against HIV infection.
We have seen recent setbacks in trials with microbicides, but such
setbacks only doubles our determination to find a solution that proves
effective and safe. WHO is also studying the safety and efficacy of the
female condom.
Governments need courage, as they decide how best to help their
people to live with HIV. This calls for effective stewardship of
resources, in ways that respond to people's real interests.
Let us focus on the challenge facing those with the cash – the
foundations, development agencies and Banks.
We are hopeful that the G8 meeting in Okinawa in two weeks will
drastically scale up the effort against the diseases of poverty;
malaria, TB and AIDS.
Comprehensive services to prevent HIV and sexually transmitted
infection will probably cost up to $3 billion per year. As leaders
become confident about the specific interventions needed, will those
with funds have the courage to back them? I appeal to governments,
international agencies and foundations to unite and respond, with their
joint forces and financial resources, to the unprecedented challenge
created by the HIV epidemic to the fight against poverty and to human
development.
Colleagues,
Leadership means making choices. Making choices with a reasonably
degree of certainty. Confidently. Creatively, so that results can be
demonstrated, and sustained. The choices will be difficult. But to
shrink away from them will mean failure.
We can make that difference. Let us work together and let it happen.
Thank you. |