Each of the major forms of malnutrition easily dwarfs most other
diseases globally, and the young are among the first—and the worst—affected.
- Some 30 million low-birth-weight babies—about 24% of the total—are
born every year, reflecting intrauterine growth retardation.
- And almost 49% of the 10 million deaths among under-five children
each year in developing countries are associated with malnutrition.
As we start our deliberations, we need to keep in mind just how
complex effective strategy development really is!
WHO, UNICEF and their partners, particularly in the UN system, have
considerable experience in developing sound, sustainable global
approaches to concrete problems that result in tangible improvements in
human health and nutrition. There are numerous, and often very different,
international strategic instruments, which involve widely differing
political and socioeconomic forces. But the successful ones all have
this in common:
-
They have been carefully prepared
-
They benefit from indispensable coalition and
consensus building, and
- They enjoy a sense of ownership—among governments as much as among
their citizen-beneficiaries.
The tangible results are here with us today—for all to see and
profit from.
It is important that we proceed as part of a careful step-by-step
process leading to the development of a systematic,
consensus-driven global strategy for infant and young child feeding.
-
As the next step, I will inform the forthcoming World
Health Assembly of the outcome of this consultation.
-
I will then provide WHO’s Executive Board and the
Health Assembly next year with feedback from our Member States and other
interested parties on a draft global strategy for infant and young child
feeding.
- In 2002, I will submit the revised draft global strategy, after
consultation, to the Executive Board and the Health Assembly for
discussion, endorsement and decision.
Let us go back two decades, to 1979. I wonder if you remember that
1979 was the International Year of the Child, during which WHO and
UNICEF organized a major international meeting on the very topic of
today’s consultation.
The preparation of an effective global strategy is a process that is
dependent as much on public awareness as on political will. Today, we
are being given a unique opportunity to contribute to the flow of human
history in an effort to improve child nutrition and health, helping to
make a purposeful and lasting difference for tomorrow’s babies and
mothers.
But this will be possible only if the international community
recognizes what it takes to formulate a successful global strategy—just
like its successful implementation, they both depend on:
, where countries and
their citizens "own" a strategy because it is right for them—because
they have been involved, from the outset, in developing and adapting it
according to their specific needs. Visibility is everything; thus, we
need to see coherent national policies that deal specifically with
infant and young child feeding across sectors.
All the main actors
—governments and civil
society combined—need to be squarely behind this process and
participating positively from their unique perspective.
An international consensus
needs to be
reached in the governing bodies of UNICEF and WHO, and
International advocacy and support, which are solidly
grounded in the best available scientific and epidemiological evidence,
need to be provided, consistent with our two organizations’
complementary mandates.
You have been asked to participate in this consultation to help us
identify the way forward. It is of course essential to build on
experience, both successes and failures; but I invite you also to give
free rein to your imagination and to suggest new initiatives that go
beyond traditional approaches to improving infant and young child
feeding.
How can we communicate better, and to the widest possible number, the
importance of something that until only recently, in evolutionary terms,
has been a major survival strategy for our species? How can we raise
awareness worldwide? How can we make sure that people everywhere
understand that breastfeeding represents nothing less than a
pledge of allegiance to ourselves?
In just eight short years, the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative has
enabled more than 16 000 institutions in 171 countries to be
designated "baby-friendly" according to the recognized
international criteria. But there are obvious imbalances, with some
countries only half-heartedly taking up the challenge—or not at all.
How can we make change? And what can we do about quality assurance where
the Initiative is already being applied?
During my travels in Africa and Asia, I have witnessed the
extraordinary challenge that mothers everywhere in resource-poor
settings face in attempting to meet their children’s feeding needs.
There is no more fitting tribute to these mothers—and possibly no more
suitable approach—than learning from what they do, and supporting them
to do it better, in a cost-effective way with particular emphasis on
timely, adequate and safe feeding.
Let us continue our focus on marketing and the forces that try
to compete with Mother Nature’s market share as a source of food for
our babies. But let us also find new ways to ensure that all concerned
parties—including governments, nongovernmental organizations,
professional groups, and food manufacturers and distributors—fulfil
their agreed responsibilities. Let us also begin to pay more attention
to what is going on further upstream—the larger forces in society,
both traditional and modern, that sometimes lead to:
premature interruption of exclusive breastfeeding, or
permit artificial feeding, which should be the exception, to become
the rule.
Then there is the painful double threat that HIV/AIDS holds for
appropriate infant-feeding practices in areas of high prevalence—the
threat of transmission through breastfeeding and the threat of death if
a child is not breastfed. We simply must refine our
collective knowledge in this vital area.
I would like to close on a brief personal reflection. During the last
session of WHO’s Executive Board, I listened with a mixture of pride
and admiration to a summary of the latest breastfeeding prevalence
figures from Norway:
92% of mothers are breastfeeding their child at 3
months of age
80% are breastfeeding at 6 months and, long after
complementary feeding has begun,
40% are still breastfeeding at 12 months!
These figures are of course due, in part, to the excellent conditions
offered to working mothers. But as a Norwegian mother and grandmother, I
know that there’s more to the story than this.
How is it that mothers throughout Scandinavia regularly breastfeed
their babies for long periods, while in so many other industrialized
countries—even where women’s participation in the labour force is
modest—rates are often dismally low?
Is it only, or even mainly, because of the generous conditions
offered mothers in paid employment?
Or is it as much due to the high value that society places on
children getting a good start in life that these conditions are so
generous?
My question, then, is this:
Before we finally decide how to make things better, are we satisfied
that we really know enough about what motivates mothers’
infant-feeding choices—and the factors that sustain or undermine positive
choices?
A generation ago WHO published the results of a major collaborative
study on breastfeeding that began in 1975 in 7 developing and 2
industrialized countries. Perhaps the time is right for a new collaborative
study that will help us build a solid evidence-based foundation for a
new strategy for improving feeding practices for infants and children
the world over.
I wish you every success in your deliberations. UNICEF and WHO are
counting on your contribution. More to the point, so are the 130 million
babies born in this world every year!
Thank you.