Good morning Sir Richard, ladies and gentlemen from IFPMA, dear
colleagues.
It is a pleasure to open the second meeting of the IFPMA-WHO round table
group. Let me welcome back those of you who were at the first meeting, and
extend a special welcome to those of you who are at WHO for the first time.
It is just over one year since we first met as a group. Looking at the
briefing note for today’s meeting and reflecting on a whole series or recent
events, I am pleased by what has been achieved in this partnership in just one
short year. We have seen great steps forward both in specific initiatives and in
the way we work together.
In a few minutes we will hear brief reports from each of the three working
groups which were established following our meeting in October last year. The
topics addressed by these groups – research and development for neglected
infectious diseases, improving access to essential drugs, and combating
substandard and counterfeit drugs – tackle critical and timely public health
issues through pragmatic and action-oriented approaches. We are very excited
both about the topics and the different ways in which the working groups have
approached them.
The three working groups have also helped to move forward other closely
related initiatives. The Medicines for Malaria Venture – MMV – which will be
launched here in this same room later this morning, is one such initiative. MMV’s
stated aim of producing one new antimalarial product every five years is
ambitious but urgently needed.
Over the last year we have seen significant progress not only in concrete
areas of work, but also in the way in which WHO and the pharmaceutical industry
work together.
For example, just last month a sequence of meetings and public communications
created misperception among some industry colleagues about WHO’s views on the
benefits and difficulties associated with different types of drug donations. My
staff worked directly with industry representatives and the Press to correct
this misperception. This and other examples demonstrate, I believe, a new and
better way of working together. Also, WHO has recently put into operation its
"Guidelines on Interaction with Commercial Enterprises" which
describes the rules and regulations by which WHO works with private enterprises.
WHO is a global public health institution accountable to its 191 Member
States and ultimately to the 6 billion people who live in those countries. You,
as Chief Executive Officers, are accountable to your shareholders. We both serve
our constituencies through our efforts to improve individual and public health.
This is our common ground – the basis for our partnership. But let us remember
that partnership is not always consensus: even the best of partners do not
always agree, and there are times when our views will differ on specific issues.
However, those are the times when tension and differences create innovative
solutions not thought about before the critical moment is reached.
Today’s meeting provides a wonderful opportunity to take stock of our
partnership, to review progress in specific areas, and to carry forward our
dialogue on questions of mutual interest. I look forward to the presentations
and discussions, on the best possible ways to promote public health worldwide.