Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Methadone maintenance treatment in Spain: the success of a harm reduction approach

Marta Torrens a, Francina Fonseca a, Claudio Castillo a & Antonia Domingo-Salvany b

a. Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addicions, Hospital del Mar, Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
b. Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques, CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain.

Correspondence to Marta Torrens (e-mail: mtorrens@hospitaldelmar.cat).

(Submitted: 01 August 2012 – Revised version received: 24 October 2012 – Accepted: 04 December 2012.)

Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2013;91:136-141. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.111054

Introduction

The epidemic of dependence on illicit drugs, especially heroin, began in Spain in the late 1970s. By 1980, the incidence of heroin use had peaked.1 In addition, the epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection started in the 1980s. According to estimates, Spain reached its highest incidence of HIV infection related to the injection of illicit drugs in 1984: 79 cases per 100 000 inhabitants.2 During the early 1980s, the network for dependence on illicit drugs had not been developed yet and therapy consisted mainly in sending patients to drug-free programmes or to residential rehabilitation facilities promoting abstinence and managed by people who were not health professionals.3 Although physicians were allowed to prescribe methadone for heroin dependence,4 treatment was available mainly in the private sector. As of 1985, only around 5000 patients were on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in Spain (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Patients on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in Spain, both in the community (1985-2009) and in prison (1992-2009), with reference to legislation an dnew cases of HIV infection related to illicit drug injection per million population
Fig. 1. Patients on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in Spain, both in the community (1985–2009) and in prison (1992–2009), with reference to legislation and new cases of HIV infection related to illicit drug injection per million inhabitants
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MO, ministerial order; RD, royal decree.The data were obtained from the Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas and Barrio G et al.5,10,11

In 1985, the establishment of the National Plan on Drugs hastened the development of a network for the treatment of opioid dependence. At that time a drug-free approach still prevailed, but in 1985 a new ministerial order abolished the private prescription of methadone.4 The drug, which was the only opioid agonist that could be used to treat heroin dependence, had to be prescribed in specially-licensed prescription centres by physicians in the public sector. These centres were designated exclusively for the administration of MMT. The new legislation surrounding MMT established a maximum daily methadone dose of 40 mg, made it obligatory to perform weekly urinalyses to detect illegal concurrent use of illicit drugs and mandated forced discharge from MMT when urinalyses gave positive results in a given patient after three months in treatment. Methadone dispensing centres were very few and waiting lists of more than 12 months were the norm. The policy on MMT was so restrictive that by 1987 only 1000 patients were still on MMT (Fig. 1). Programmes that followed a drug-free approach and provided treatment with naltrexone were practically the only ones available, despite their low client retention rates.6 At the same time, the National Register of AIDS Cases showed that by the end of 1993, 14 479 AIDS cases had been diagnosed among people injecting heroin. This represented 64% of all AIDS cases diagnosed in Spain at the time and Spain was the European country with the largest number of AIDS cases related to the injection of illicit drugs.7

The objective of this paper is to describe the influence of Spanish laws surrounding OAMT on the health of people dependent on heroin, including HIV infection rates among them.

Approach

The great spread of HIV infection brought about substantial changes in the laws surrounding the prescription and dispensation of methadone in Spain.4 With the new law in 1990, the approach to the treatment of heroin dependence changed; a drug-free approach gave way to one focused on harm reduction. OAMT for opioid dependence was available in specially-licensed public or non-profit centres, including prisons, with full or partial public support. Centres rather than individual professionals were licensed to both prescribe and dispense OAMT and only physicians working in the special centres could order this treatment. Methadone was practically the only drug used in OAMT. The criteria for admission to treatment included: (i) a diagnosis of opioid dependence; (ii) a history of drug-free treatment (except for pregnant women and HIV-infected individuals). There were no restrictions on methadone dosage or length of treatment.

The last change in legislation, in 1996, made a diagnosis of opioid dependence the only requirement for enrolment in OAMT.4 Apart from public centres, physicians in private practice and pharmacies could also be licensed to prescribe and dispense methadone.4

Centre characteristics

Although the law of 1996 authorized the use of different opioid agonists in OAMT, oral methadone has been by far the one most frequently prescribed.4 Methadone is available in all regions of Spain, mainly in the public health system (free of charge) but also in private practice. The distribution and organization of MMT centres differs by region. Centres involved in methadone treatment can be classified according to their particular activity: prescribing and dispensing, dispensing only or prescribing only. Prescribing and dispensing centres perform a variety of treatment-related activities, from prescribing the drug to fixing dosing and treatment duration, performing periodic urinalyses, providing counselling services and dispensing the drug. Centres that only prescribe are also involved in most of the aforementioned activities, but they do not dispense methadone. Centres that only dispense do nothing more than provide patients with their dose of methadone. Most centres that prescribe only and that prescribe as well as dispense are located in specific services that also offer treatments for dependence on drugs other than opioids, such as cocaine or sedatives, and alcohol abuse. Methadone could be dispensed in drug dependence centres, primary health centres, mental health facilities, prisons and pharmacies. Most centres that only dispense methadone are located in primary health-care services.

OAMT in Spain is characterized by the following: (i) a diagnosis of opioid dependence is the only eligibility criterion; (ii) opioid dosage is individualized according to a patient’s clinical course, without any upper limit; (iii) treatment is as long as needed and long-term OAMT is encouraged; (iv) a take-home policy is highly recommended and decisions are made individually, on clinical grounds; (v) in most centres, violence, consumption and trafficking in the centre are the only criteria for forced discharge, in which case centre staff make efforts to transfer the patient to another treatment centre for continuation of OAMT; (vi) suspension of OAMT is decided by agreement among centre team members and the patient in accordance with personal and social considerations and clinical parameters.

Most of the centres involved in OAMT treatment also provide screening for HIV infection, hepatitis C virus infection, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and tuberculosis, as well as HBV vaccination. They also supervise daily treatment for these conditions if needed. Combination treatment with buprenorphine and naloxone has been authorized in Spain since 2008 and was included in the public health system in 2010. Unlike methadone, buprenorphine and naloxone can be purchased with a prescription in any pharmacy.

Methadone maintenance treatment in prisons

People dependent on heroin who were not on OAMT often had trouble with the law and more and more were being incarcerated. The law passed in 1990 included a paragraph on the use of methadone in prisons4 and, since December 1999, MMT has been available in almost all prisons. This makes it possible for inmates to start or continue MMT and to continue treatment in a community programme after being released.

Changes observed

Opioid agonist maintenance treatment

Regional differences in health service structure led to considerable diversity in the structural characteristics of OAMT networks. In 1994, 224 of the 280 centres providing MMT in Spain were assessed. A total of 13 402 patients were receiving MMT in the study centres; they had a mean age of 29 years, 79% were males and about 60% were HIV-positive. The proportion of the population on MMT varied by region (mean: 6.7 patients in MMT per 10 000 inhabitants; range: 0.9–15.8).8

After the change in legislation that took place in 1996, another study9 reported a large increase in the number of MMT patients, a 125% increase in methadone centres, and a significant increase in the availability of MMT in prisons (Fig. 1). According to data for 1992, 90 prisoners were enrolled in MMT10 and the number increased progressively until 2001, when 24 304 patients were enrolled in MMT. Since then, the number has decreased from 24 015 in 2002 to 20 055 in 2009 (Fig. 1).11

The laws surrounding MMT have remained unchanged in Spain since 1996. In 2007, a progressive increase in the number of patients on MMT began to occur and peaked at 81 706 the same year, and a slow downward trend began after that (Fig. 1). Changes in legislation in 1990 and 1996, previously described, and the parallel expansion of OAMT produced a rise in OAMT coverage from 21% in 1996 to 43% in 1999. By 2010 OAMT coverage had reached 60%.5 Some longitudinal studies have been performed; one of them showed that retention within MMT programmes was 72% after 44 months in treatment.12

Impact on mortality and morbidity

A decrease in mortality associated with MMT has been demonstrated in a cohort study;13 the main factor associated with overdose mortality was not being in MMT at the time of death. Also, MMT influenced AIDS related mortality. In this study, overall mortality decreased from 59 deaths per 1000 person-years in 1992 to 16 in 1999.13 A steady decrease in the number of new HIV cases related to illicit drug injection was observed (Fig. 1).5

Impact on quality of life

The availability of OAMT has led to an improvement in health-related quality of life for people dependent on illicit heroin. One study showed that this improvement was substantial after only 30 days of treatment and throughout the follow-up period in patients on MMT who were observed for a period of 3 years.14

Discussion

Since 1999, Spain has been one of the countries with the highest levels of OAMT coverage in the world.15 Estimates show that in the European Union, about half of the people who are dependent on illicit opioids have access to MMT. Coverage figures are comparable to those reported in Australia and the United States of America and higher than figures from Canada, China and the Russian Federation (where OAMT has not been introduced yet). Coverage of the target population varies between European countries. It is over 60% in Luxembourg, Malta and Spain; 40–60% in Austria, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and Norway; 30–40% in the Czech Republic and Hungary; and less than 30% in Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia.5,16 Methadone is the most commonly prescribed opioid agonist in Europe; it is used in 75% of patients on OAMT. Overall buprenorphine is the second most commonly used opioid agonist, although it is the one most often used as opioid maintenance treatment in Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Finland, France and Sweden. Other opioid agonists are available in some countries: slow-release morphine in Austria, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Slovenia; codeine in Cyprus and Germany, and diacetylmorphine in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. However, these represent only a small proportion of the treatments used. Financing of OAMT varies between European countries. Lack of public funding is the main obstacle to their expansion in countries such as Bulgaria and Poland.17

In Spain, public opinion surrounding OAMT has been regularly evaluated since 1995. About 66% of the general population is in favour of methadone treatment for opioid dependence and nearly 50% favours the medical use of heroin.18

Preventing the spread of HIV infection takes more than OAMT; it also depends on other harm reduction strategies, such as the establishment of needle and syringe programmes and supervised injection centres, free distribution of condoms and provision of highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to reduce viral load in HIV-positive individuals, and hence the risk of viral transmission. In Spain, syringe provision started in 1989 and was very low until 1995, but it increased considerably during 1995–1999, stabilized in 1999–2004 and then decreased again. However, longitudinal analyses show that moderate coverage (i.e. 100–200 syringes per injected opioid user or 20–40% of users) was reached by 2000, but high levels (i.e. > 200 syringes per user or > 40% of users) had not been reached yet in 2010.5 The first supervised injection centre in Spain became operative in Madrid in 2000; in 2002 a second one became operative in Barcelona, where seven such centres were active by 2012. HAART has been widely available free of charge for all HIV-positive people in Spain since late 1996. Its use has been associated with a reduction in progression to AIDS and in AIDS-related mortality.13

Future directions in Spain

After an epidemic of dependence on illicit drugs, especially heroin, that has lasted for more than 30 years, Spain has learned several important lessons to do with efforts to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with drug dependence (Box 1). In future, several actions will be required to continue to address this problem in Spain. Some of the most important ones will be the provision of OAMT, needle and syringe exchange programmes, supervised injection, condom dispensation and vaccination against hepatitis B in treatment facilities for people dependent on injected opioids. Just as important will be recognizing the need to diagnose and treat psychiatric comorbidity in patients dependent on illicit drugs and offering them integrated, or at least parallel, treatment in networks for drug dependence and mental health networks. However, the effects of the current economic crisis are unpredictable. When this paper was written, methadone treatment was still government-funded, but a worsening of the crisis could result in decreased public funding and a change in epidemiologic trends in the use of injected opioids.

Box 1. Summary of main lessons learnt

  • Moral concepts and prejudices that hinder legislation and interfere with the implementation of OAMT have been more influential in the treatment of opioid dependence than the scientific evidence.
  • To attend public health needs, OAMT should be integrated in harm reduction programmes, primarily in prisons and other public facilities.
  • Longitudinal studies are needed to detect unmet needs and evaluate the impact and suitability of OAMT interventions.

Acknowledgements

We thank Paola Rossi for her valuable comments. Our work was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto Carlos III (RD06/0001/1009).

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

Share